[ Content | Sidebar ]

Frequently Asked Questions

How does BuiltWith.com work?

When you lookup a page on BuiltWith, a robot goes off deep into cyberspace and looks at the page in question. It them compares that page with the technology list at BuiltWith.com and if it finds any matches, reports the information to you.

Does BuiltWith.com use reverse engineering?

No! BuiltWith.com doesn’t do any trickery to find out what technologies a page is using. All the information that BuiltWith.com reports on can be found yourself by clicking View..Source in your browser.

Doesn’t reporting this information make it easier for hackers to get into my site?

No! See the last question.

BuiltWith.com says a site uses [technology] but it doesn’t, what is going on?

A number of reasons can cause this -

  1. BuiltWith.com detects technology by matching substrings of the technology name. If a page contains a matching substring it will report the page as featuring that technology.
  2. BuiltWith.com caches search results, it may be possible that the page has been modified since the technology was used.

Builtwith.com doesn’t find [technology] on the site report but I know it uses it.

Reasons why -

  1. BuiltWith can only report what it finds, if your site uses a technology but there is no information to suggest the technology exists it will not report it. BuiltWith relies on default settings, for example, if you use Scriptaculous JavaScript library but don’t use the filename scriptaculous.js there’s no way it will be found.
  2. The technology isn’t listed. If this is the case visit the Suggestion Page to add or modify a listing.

8 Comments

Write comment - Trackback - RSS Comments

  1. Comment by Tobie Langel:

    Hi,

    checking for the presence of script.aculo.us via scriptaculous.js isn’t the best solution. Most people don’t include scriptaculous.js at all as it’s planned for development only. You’d be better of checking for effect.js.

    Regards,

    Tobie

    August 15, 2007 @ 12:22 am

  2. Comment by Jacques:

    I get this: “128.43% of all profiled sites use Cascading Style Sheets.” Huh?

    August 15, 2007 @ 12:43 pm

  3. Comment by Michael S.:

    HTML Strict is incorrectly being reported as XHTML Strict; compare

    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbeebo.org%2F

    and

    http://builtwith.com/default.aspx?beebo.org

    Also, there’s no email address for bug reports.

    August 17, 2007 @ 10:25 am

  4. Comment by Scott:

    You spelled JavaScript “JavasScript” and might want to fix that.

    August 18, 2007 @ 12:12 am

  5. Comment by Jonathan:

    Is there any way to update the cache? Results seem stale.

    October 19, 2007 @ 8:29 am

  6. Comment by asdf:

    Is there any way to refresh the cache?

    October 23, 2007 @ 12:43 am

  7. Comment by Abhay:

    Is there any way to get readded to list after removal.
    And same Question as above
    Is there any way to refresh the cache?

    October 24, 2007 @ 12:14 pm

  8. Comment by seegoceew:

    Hello! simply super resource

    December 20, 2008 @ 2:46 am

Write comment